Answer: PEDS has three steps:
1. Give parents the PEDS Response Form to complete or use it as an interview.
2. Take the PEDS Score Form and find the right column for the child’s age. Put a check in each box when parents’ had a concern. The directions at the bottom show you the correct path to follow on the
PEDS Interpretation Form.
3. Follow the directions on the PEDS Interpretation Form for deciding when to refer, screen further, give advise, wait and see, or reassure.
Implementing PEDS in a busy practice What’s the best way to implement PEDS in a busy pediatric practice?
Answer: To implement PEDS easily in primary care, it is optimal—if
not essential—to involve your front office staff in the process.
While their first reaction may be to groan and say there is too much
paperwork already, there are several things you can do to make it
work smoothly and easily. This involves giving the staff a strong
rationale for using PEDS and lots of control in how it is delivered.
1. First give the office staff some background information on why
screening is important.
2. Second, let them know that a PEDS Response Form needs to be
given to every family before they see the provider, but let the staff
decide where and when (e.g. in the mail or over the phone along with
an appointment reminder, at-check in, when seeing the medical
technician, when ushered to an exam room, etc.)
3. Office staff will also need to ask families discreetly whether
they would like to complete the measure on their own or need someone
to go through it with them in order to circumvent literacy issues.
4. Give office staff the option of administering an interview
version when needed and scoring the measure. This speeds things up
for the professional staff. However, if the office staff are
unwilling to do this, the offer will at least let them see that the
entire burden of screening is not falling on their shoulders and that
it is shared with others in the office.
Why can’t I photocopy or otherwise reproduce PEDS? Why can’t I photocopy PEDS? It would be cheaper, and some measures allow this.
Answer: First, photocopying is theft. It is illegal under the Bourne
Convention and carries a minimum penalty of $200,000. This extends to
electronic reproduction including posting copyrighted measures on
websites.
Second, even when, as is the case with some tools, photocopying is permitted, it is not cheaper. Photocopying costs—a
lot. Per page it is a minimum of 53¢ if a physician photocopies, 35¢
if a nurse photocopies it, and 23¢ if office staff photocopies it.
And, that's just for a single page! For a more detailed explanation,
see this page
Third, you should be readily able to cover the minimal
cost of PEDS (which is less than $0.50 for print and less than $1.00
for electronic) from reimbursement for well-visits especially now
that the 96110 procedure code for screening carries separate
reimbursement. If you are not getting reimbursed appropriately,
please appeal your claims and contact the AAP's Office of Billing and
Coding (www.aap.org)
Fourth, revenues from PEDS sales support foreign-
language translations and quality improvements to the tool, ensure
the availability of its author to consult with providers and
researchers, provide a living wage to employees of the publishing
companies, and enable PEDS to be restandardized and validated
periodically so that its psychometric underpinnings remain current
and empirically sound.1.3. What happened to the 30-day exam?
What happened to the 30-day exam? What happened to the 30-day exam? Don't you offer a 30-day examination copy?
Answer: The 30-day examination program has been discontinued. In its
stead, we have an 8-page booklet that explains PEDS and how it works,
and includes sample forms to give you a feel for the test. We also have a case example on the site that shows completed PEDS Forms.
You can download a copy of the PEDS Brochure by clicking here and download a case example clicking here
Answer: PEDS is online for parents at www.forepath.org and available
electronically in versions suitable for PDA's and electronic medical
records. If interested, please contact us [online@pedstest.com] but
also see the additional FAQs at the bottom of this page.
Why did the Forms change in February, 2005 Why did you remove the numbers from the questions on the PEDS Response Form? Why did the Interpretation form change?
Answer: We removed the numbering from both questions and scoring
because some clinicians thought that anything problematic mentioned
in Question 1 required a check in the first box on the Score Form,
that concerns raised in response to Question 2 required a check in
the second box on the Score Form, Question 3 to the third box, and so
on.
This is not how to score PEDS. Rather, all the things that parents
write in must be categorized into the various developmental domains
and the boxes on the Score Form which should be checked only for the
categories of concern. So, removing the numbering helps alert
clinicians to categorize, not “score by numbers”. We added a division
on Path B to better guide clinicians when health concerns are the
main issue. For example, a concern about whether a child is eating
enough or sleeping well, now prompts providers to view existing
height and weight charts, review sleeping behaviors, offer patient
education, etc. Such responses constitute a second-stage screen but
with an initial focus on health-related issues.
Overall, it is critical to make copious use of the PEDS Brief Guide
and adhere carefully to the directions therein.
Why do I need PEDS? I use bits of the Denver, the PDQ, or a checklist I created. Why do I need PEDS?
Answer: 1. The Denver/PDQ were not standardized except in Colorado. What
do these measures have to say about children residing elsewhere? Very
little!
2. The Denver/PDQ were not validated and the authors provided no
proof that the items actually work. Research by other authors
indicate they don't.
3. The Denver/PDQ are too long for primary care. Using selected
items probably degrades accuracy even further.
4. Administering informal measures and making clinical
observations take more time than it takes to give PEDS.
5. Informal checklists lack proof and decision support. If a
patient fails one item, do you refer? Or do you wait until two items
are failed? Three? What's the right thing to do? Who knows? What if
your patient can do all items. Do you know he or she is OK? No!
6. PEDS provides clear guidance on when to refer and when not to
refer. It is OK to look further at children's skills. But, it is not
OK to over-ride the evidence PEDS provides (e.g., predictive
concerns) with informal measures that lack any proof.
Answer: No! (although we can license such applications if your office
can count PEDS’ use and establish a license agreement with us).
Contact [online@pedstest.org] for assistance.
Revenues from PEDS sales fund foreign language translations,
validation, standardization, and accuracy studies. Revenues from
PEDS are funneled into research and they also provide salaries for
the staff [http://www.pedstest.com/content.php?content=staff.html]
who work for EV Press and their families Our overhead is low (lower
than many charities) and we provide such support services as slide
shows for "train the trainers", trainees, ongoing FAQs, a discussion
list on early detection, etc.
We encourage you instead, to purchase PEDS for each child with whom
you work. The cost is less than $0.30 per encounter. You can bill and
receive often generous reimbursement via the 96110 screening
procedure code. This will more than cover not only the cost of PEDS
but also your time. As importantly, if you laminate PEDS, you will
not have a record of what the parent said. This makes longitudinal
monitoring and follow-up impossible. You need to keep the PEDS
Response Form in the chart at least until the next visit when a new
one is completed. And, you need to keep track of each child's results
and decisions on the PEDS Score/Interpretation Form that should also
remain in the child's chart. So, purchase PEDS, use our online
application, contact us for support and advice, and... "do the right
thing".
Should parents fill out a new form with each visit? Our clinicians are trying to save money on PEDS by giving the same form to parents they used at the last visit. Is this OK?
Answer: No! Development develops and developmental problems do too.
Giving parents the same form again may coerce them into giving the
same answers as they gave at the last visit even though their child
may now be lagging in language or other critical skills. PEDS
questions help parents think about development like professionals do,
as a range of domains. The second(+) time through it, they have often
thought more carefully about how their children are doing and need to
be free to express that. A fresh form is essential. If providers are
concerned about having too many forms in the chart, remove the last
one and just keep the current one.
Revenues from PEDS are used to continually improve the measure—just
in the way that paying for vaccines goes to ensure they combat the
latest version of flu. Developmental measures are expensive to create
and maintain and clinicians need to be encouraged to respect that.
But if providers are uncomfortable with PEDS, with its focus on
parents' concerns, they may prefer a different approach. Please read
about the PEDS:Developmental Milestones (PEDS:DM) which is a
validated and accurate method for screening and monitoring children's
skills: (www.pedstest.com/dm). PEDS+the PEDS:DM is an optimal
approach to both screening and surveillance and both approaches
involve only 16 - 18 items at each well visit while giving clinicians
a range of information on how best to address parents' concerns in
light of how their children are actually doing.
PEDS and PEDS:DM - what's the difference? I am not familar with your products, I am trying to adhere to
the new guidelines by the AAP, and need help with difference between
PEDS and PEDS DM.
Answer: For compliance with the AAP's new statement you'll need both
tools. PEDS elicits parents' concerns (in 10 questions, the same ones
at each visit) and should be used at every well-child encounter. The
PEDS:DM can either be used simultaneously or when PEDS calls for
additional information before deciding whether a referral is needed.
The PEDS:DM is 6 - 8 items per encounter and can be administered by
parent-report or directly to children. Each one samples a different
developmental domain: fine and gross motor, receptive and expressive
language, self-help, social-emotional, and for older children math,
reading, and spelling/writing. Both measures span the 0 to 8 year age
range. So in 16 - 18 items (about five minutes of parents' time), you
can provide longitudinal monitoring and address parents' concerns. As
an aside, the PEDS:DM is entirely laminated comes with supplemental
measures (such as the Modified Checklist of Autism in Toddlers) which
the AAP suggests at 18 months for all children, as well as other
tools (like parent-child interactions measures, a mental health
screen for older children, etc.) for a more expanded response to meet
the AAP reccomendations. There's a single longitudinal recording form
that covers both measures that's kept in the chart. See PEDS:DM
Why would I want to elicit even more parents' concerns? I am already overrun with concerns from parents. Why on earth
would I want to use a tool that would elicit even more concerns?
Answer: Parents’ concerns have ways of cropping up at inopportune
times. You can prevent that by pre-empting them. With PEDS, you allow
parents to express their thoughts before you work with them. This
enables you to prepare, collect your thoughts and resources, and
respond wisely. PEDS virtually eliminates “doorknob” concerns—the “oh
by the way” ones that crop up unexpectedly at the end of an encounter
and often take time from the next child and family, disrupt patient
flow, etc.
I notice problems all the time. Why do I need PEDS? I am an experienced professional and do not believe that I miss many, if any children with problems. In fact, I notice problems all the time. So why would I need to use PEDS?
Answer: First PEDS helps you ask well. Parents don’t respond to some
types of questions. Parents with limited education don't always know
you are interested in development. Asking carefully, let them know
that developmental behavioral issues are a part of your services.
Second, PEDS guides you in how best to deal with concerns once they
are raised. Some concerns are not significant predictors of problems,
while others are. PEDS tells you children’s level of risk for
developmental and behavioral problems and what to do next. It will
keep you from deferring, deferring, deferring when you should be
referring, referring, referring and will keep you from referring for
unneeded services, as well.
Finally, PEDS reduces or eliminates
"doorknob" concerns—those "oh, by the way" questions that can come up
just when you think you’ve finished an encounter and that can disrupt
the flow of families through your office.
Will insurance companies cover 96110, as Medicaid generally does?
Answer: Following discussions with the AAP, CIGNA HealthCare (CIGNA) issued clarifications for coding and payment for claims for limited developmental testing. The carrier verified that it will pay for both the preventive medicine evaluation and management (E/M) service in addition to the limited developmental testing (reported as CPT code 96110).
Claims submitted with the preventive medicine E/M code and CPT code 96110 appended with modifier 59 (distinct procedural service) will be automatically processed in CIGNA claims system. Also, effective May 1, 2008 as an alternative acceptable modifier billing mechanism, CIGNA will also pay CPT code 96110 as a separate and distinct procedure, when submitted with a preventive medicine E/M service code appended with modifier 25. However, claims submitted with modifier 25 appended to the preventive medicine E/M service code requires manual processing by CIGNA, which may extend the claims processing timeframe.
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, the state’s largest insurer, has agreed to pay on claims using modifier 59. Originally slated to be valid January 1, 2009, Horizon has agreed to pay claims using modifier 59 as of October 1, 2008.
Pediatricians experiencing denials from CIGNA for claims reporting CPT code 96110 should contact the AAP Coding Hotline at aapcodinghotline@aap.org.
One area that is not quite clear to me is scoring when the child has a combination of predicitve concerns Path A or B and one or more non-predictive concerns Path C. Do Paths A B over-ride Path C, or do we record two paths? For example, if there is one predictive concern tan circle and one non-predictive concern square, is the child on Path B or is the child on both Path B and Path C?
Answer: Yes, Path A and B concerns override Path C (because children with a high risk of developmental problems often have behavioral ones too). So best to refer and see what shakes out in terms of need for special services. If a child doesn't qualify, then return to Path B (which prompts for Head Start, preschool, parent training, etc.) along with much watchful waiting and more frequent re-screening than usual. At that point, provide parents the kind of in-office counseling/parent education needed for Path C kids.
Sometimes parents indicate a concern but I disagree that there's an actual delay. What do I do?
Answer: The evidence remains with the abundant research behind PEDS; and the predictive value of parents' concerns to identify probable problems. Avoid using informal milestones checklists to dis-confirm a concern because checklists are known to miss 70% of children with problems. If more information is needed on a child's actual skill levels, use a high quality second-stage screen such as PEDS:Developmental Milestones to confirm or dis-confirm delays.
Nevertheless, sometimes parents are clearly expressing a concern about their own knowledge of child development (e.g., "What should my child be doing at this age?"). These families clearly need parenting information. Still, they are also families at risk of having a child with delays. Administering an additional screen is wise, as are referrals to Head Start, quality preschool/day care programs, and/or parent training programs. In addition, vigilant "watchful waiting" is needed and thus more careful monitoring of progress.